New Lectronic Ign by CBP

User avatar
Dale M.
Posts: 1673
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:09 am

New Lectronic Ign by CBP

Post by Dale M. »

DB & HVW Magazine (Sept. 2011) Has article about CB Performances new Lectronic Ign... Uses crank fire (good) disk on pulley and CAM SYNC via dist body (bad)...

What you think?.... Though whole idea was to get rid of dist body (even for cam sync)....

Didn't bother reading whole article, was turned off by picture of dist body still in place.....

Dale
"Fear The Government That Wants To Take Your Guns" - Thomas Jefferson
1970 "Kellison Sand Piper Roadster"
helowrench
Posts: 1925
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 6:20 am

Re: New Lectronic Ign by CBP

Post by helowrench »

If the dizzy drive is just telling it which cyl is adue for ign and the crank trigger wheel is doing the actual timing signal, then there is nothing wrong with it.
Other than aesthetics........
Rob
User avatar
supaninja
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:48 pm

Re: New Lectronic Ign by CBP

Post by supaninja »

With a cam sync signal then it's most likely sequential ignition which is good. Knowing CB's prices, it would be cheaper to just use a megasquirt for ignition only with a trigger wheel and wasted spark if you want to put a plug in place of the dizzy.
Image
'65 notch w/ a squirted type 4
http://supaninjanick.wordpress.com/
'68 "Zombie Response Vehicle" Westy
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=140387
User avatar
Piledriver
Moderator
Posts: 22867
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am

Re: New Lectronic Ign by CBP

Post by Piledriver »

The cam sync on MS systems isn't used for actual timing calculations, it's only so it knows that "next crank tooth is TDC #1"
I'd hope the CB system does the same.

A distributor (even a shell with a single tooth//hall pickup) is a ~convenient way to get that cam phase pulse.
One might even be able to adapt some of the hall effect speedometer drives (think Mk4 VW, assuming those are one pulse per rev.) and have nothing there but a stub and a connector.

There are other ways to get sync data, but ~all rely on opening up the engine or installing hall sensors in valve covers etc. to accomplish the same.
As long as you aren't relying on it for precision timing data, it's all good.

If you don't like the looks and want sequential ignition... get out the drill or run something off the dist. drive, one could easily build a sensor setup that fit fully in the hole, nothing sticking out but a wire... In fact, one could have the sensor on the side of the block off the dist bore... but if it's only for looks..

If you aren't running >7K, waste spark and semi-sequential injection* would work for 99% of uses.
Over 7K with most setups you can run into dwell limitations with waste spark.



(*batch but with controllable, consistent timing of injection)
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
User avatar
Dale M.
Posts: 1673
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:09 am

Re: New Lectronic Ign by CBP

Post by Dale M. »

hmmm.... Was trying to get away from distributor all together but need RPM range up to 7500 rpm or so (Performance motor)...

Can see where Compufire unit in dist body (with advance locked out????) with three magnets removed from disk may be useable as sync signal though....

Dale
"Fear The Government That Wants To Take Your Guns" - Thomas Jefferson
1970 "Kellison Sand Piper Roadster"
Post Reply