bug66 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 04, 2018 12:09 am
lakis1982 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 03, 2018 11:40 pm
as far as i know water to air intercooler are less efficient.. I wouldnt prefer that option..
I also have an external oil cooler mounted in front of the vehicle with two fans attached on it.. Do u still think i will have colling issues with the engine ?
Are they? Mine got so cold with water running through it, I almost couldn't touch it..
Some pro's and con's stolen from enginebasics.com:
Air to air:
Pro’s
1. Requires no power to work and therefore is easy to set up.
2. Requires no liquids to work and therefore no chances for leaks .
3. Doesn’t suffer from heat-soak as long as the intercooler is seeing good airflow.
Con’s
1. Efficiency is only as good as the ambient air temperature.
2. Efficiency is only as good as the amount of airflow the intercooler see’s.
3. Cannot be mounted anywhere, since it must be mounted in a location to see airflow.
Air to water:
Pro’s
1. Really good efficiency, so the size of the intercooler can be smaller.
2. Efficiency can be exaggerated by using ice, or other chemicals to produce normally un-realistic temperatures for short amounts of time.
3. Can be mounted anywhere along the charge piping route.
Con’s
1. Requires a lot of other accessories to work.
2. Because it is more complex, it naturally causes more opportunity for problems, like leaks.
3. Can become heat soaked when used for long periods of hard driving and become terribly in-efficient.