Hi-perf Rod's suitable for 24mm WBX wrist pin
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22863
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22863
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
The stock rods are a known weak part on the WBX, the big ends go out of round at high mileage on stock motors.. The 1010 forging (IIRC) doesn't cut it.marcotheturbosteamengine wrote:i cant see what all the fuss is aboutjust use the stock rod, and put some arp bolts in them, i would rather use a 20year old german part, than a brand new chinese part
and then use stateside for the machining.
you guys are of your rockers
A set of lighter, stronger, CrMo rods with 3/8" ARP2000 bolts run $89. I don't think anyone has ever been able to say anything bad about the Chinese forgings.. Perhaps the machining can vary (which is why most places do that in-house, SCAT, Eagle.. etc), but the forgings themselves are typically excellent.
The (lesser quality, smaller, heavier) ARP 9mm stock replacements (only available in std ARP 8740(?), not ARP2000 or better) cost ~$97-$140, depending on who has them when you need them.
Unless your shop is raping you, the Unitechs will easily cost less than rebuilding a set of stock rods + ARP bolts. Maybe less than with stock bolts...
My EMW 2.0 Hbeams small end bushing is paper thin, if that. If it wasn't for the color difference, I'd swear there wasn't even a bushing there. I had to look, repeatedly. I still can't measure the thickness, or see a bushing from the side.
If the std T1 bushing is 26mm in dia, that would leave 1mm all around, which is apparently almost 1mm more than is required.
Oh, I'll be finding out for sure in a week or 2, the Busagain finally spun a bearing at 275K miles, finally building up the spare shortblock.
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
-
marcotheturbosteamengine
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 12:01 am
The stock wbx rods are not week, the big end goes out of round when the stock cranked engine is over reved(flexing), or it has oil starvation(week oil pump/preasure)and spins a barring, or the bolts streched(2.1 rods over reving again)Piledriver wrote:
The stock rods are a known weak part on the WBX, the big ends go out of round at high mileage on stock motors.. The 1010 forging (IIRC) doesn't cut it.
A set of lighter, stronger, CrMo rods with 3/8" ARP2000 bolts run $89. I don't think anyone has ever been able to say anything bad about the Chinese forgings.. Perhaps the machining can vary (which is why most places do that in-house, SCAT, Eagle.. etc), but the forgings themselves are typically excellent.
The (lesser quality, smaller, heavier) ARP 9mm stock replacements (only available in std ARP 8740(?), not ARP2000 or better) cost ~$97-$140, depending on who has them when you need them.
Unless your shop is raping you, the Unitechs will easily cost less than rebuilding a set of stock rods + ARP bolts. Maybe less than with stock bolts...
My EMW 2.0 Hbeams small end bushing is paper thin, if that. If it wasn't for the color difference, I'd swear there wasn't even a bushing there. I had to look, repeatedly. I still can't measure the thickness, or see a bushing from the side.
If the std T1 bushing is 26mm in dia, that would leave 1mm all around, which is apparently almost 1mm more than is required.
Oh, I'll be finding out for sure in a week or 2, the Busagain finally spun a bearing at 275K miles, finally building up the spare shortblock.
most of the time the poor wbx is beaten up all its life with no servicing, and people blame the "week"rods!
i would love to see 100,000mile unitech rod in a wasser after the abuse the common brick layer gives it, you would probaly see it hanging out of the block in 20,000miles
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22863
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
We'll have to agree to disagree, Marco.
Staying in one piece at rediculous power for a few thousand miles != staying in spec for 300K.
I have an automatic, and that can ~guarantee the motor has never seen over 5K RPM in its life, even at WOT merging on the freeway.
It HAS had marginal oil pressure since I got it at 207K, as the big ends were surely ovaled out, which is what kills these engines most of the time assuming they are maintained properly otherwise.
Second owner, have all records, always ran syn oil.
The rods usually kill them much earlier.
(They are also usually on manual transmissions, I'm sure there's a correlation there)
I'm going to give some 4130 Chromemoly rods with 3/8" ARP2000 bolts a shot.
Staying in one piece at rediculous power for a few thousand miles != staying in spec for 300K.
I have an automatic, and that can ~guarantee the motor has never seen over 5K RPM in its life, even at WOT merging on the freeway.
It HAS had marginal oil pressure since I got it at 207K, as the big ends were surely ovaled out, which is what kills these engines most of the time assuming they are maintained properly otherwise.
Second owner, have all records, always ran syn oil.
The rods usually kill them much earlier.
(They are also usually on manual transmissions, I'm sure there's a correlation there)
I'm going to give some 4130 Chromemoly rods with 3/8" ARP2000 bolts a shot.
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
-
marcotheturbosteamengine
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 12:01 am
the wbx motor was simply not designed for more than around 100k before a rebuild is necessary, and then people do a "topend" rebuild because it stops the motor overheating,stops leaking water gaskets and gets the motor back on the road, and ofcourse its cheaper than compleat rebuild!Piledriver wrote:We'll have to agree to disagree, Marco.
Staying in one piece at rediculous power for a few thousand miles != staying in spec for 300K.
I have an automatic, and that can ~guarantee the motor has never seen over 5K RPM in its life, even at WOT merging on the freeway.
It HAS had marginal oil pressure since I got it at 207K, as the big ends were surely ovaled out, which is what kills these engines most of the time assuming they are maintained properly otherwise.
Second owner, have all records, always ran syn oil.
The rods usually kill them much earlier.
(They are also usually on manual transmissions, I'm sure there's a correlation there)
I'm going to give some 4130 Chromemoly rods with 3/8" ARP2000 bolts a shot.
that is exataly what i mean, you had oil presure problems at 207k but still drove is untill 270k!!!bang bang bang! "oh its needs a rebuild" it needed a rebuild at 207k when it had low oil presure, the barrings had worn out alowing to much oil past the barrings, the oil pump couldent keep up with the extra flow needed to maintain presure, the barrings continued to ware untill there is too much clearance between the barring and the crank, and small amout of banging acures witch you cant hear, the only banging you can hear is when the barring eventualy fails.
the 4130 Chromemoly rods with 3/8" ARP2000 bolts are fine, but the proplem its not the rod, its the barrings and oil system.
99.9% of the time number 3 rod barring fails because its the ferthest/last/longest oil galary and the first to starve of oil.
iv found this to be true in stock and modified wbx.
- joop
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 1:25 am
My experience is the other way around... When a car and/or bike is autobahn proof for hours you can race it also! (here in europa)Staying in one piece at rediculous power for a few thousand miles != staying in spec for 300K.
I can imagine it's like you discribed in the US. The fact is that the most US build cars with auto transmissions will break the autotrans on our highways (engines too)
I am a big fan of two strokes
For example: my dragbike runs 1:100 oil/fuel ratio (it will hang a piston on the road) where my street bike can not do without less than 1:50
When a car is only used around town (even at high speeds) It will have to prove itself on the autobahn.
When my cars/bikes stay together during trips trough europa, I won't be facing oiling and cooling problems on the track.
Here a low pressure pic

when I worked in a MAN/VW garage, many vanagons came in with very little oil or skipped a service or two. It where those cars that loose their rodsmost of the time the poor wbx is beaten up all its life with no servicing, and people blame the "week"rods!
- fastback
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2001 12:01 am
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22863
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
Are those the CB I-beams mentioned earlier?killer_15146 wrote:
They have a lot more meat on the small end than my EMW 2.0 H-Beams...
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
-
killer_15146
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:14 pm
- akciddento
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:14 am
???killer_15146 wrote:Piledriver wrote:nope those are Scat H-beams, don't know if they'll do the job yet as I still haven't fired up the engine... but they should be okkiller_15146 wrote: Are those the CB I-beams mentioned earlier?
They have a lot more meat on the small end than my EMW 2.0 H-Beams...
killer - these are scat h beams....


???
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22863
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
The ones in the previously referenced pic sure look like I-Beams to me 
(So, just to confirm, those are SCAT I-Beams, not the CB ones?)
As to Accidentos H-Beams... Nice.
You have much more rod bushing than my 2.0 EMW rods.
CIP1 has a nice pic of the CB UniTech+ rods small end...
http://www2.cip1.com/ProductDetails.asp ... C13%2D8340
Looks like LOTS more meat for a 24mm pin.
I'm trying to find these with ARP2000 bolts (without spending too much more).
(So, just to confirm, those are SCAT I-Beams, not the CB ones?)
As to Accidentos H-Beams... Nice.
You have much more rod bushing than my 2.0 EMW rods.
CIP1 has a nice pic of the CB UniTech+ rods small end...
http://www2.cip1.com/ProductDetails.asp ... C13%2D8340
Looks like LOTS more meat for a 24mm pin.
I'm trying to find these with ARP2000 bolts (without spending too much more).
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
-
killer_15146
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:14 pm
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22863
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
Found a fellow who sells what APPEAR to be the CB Unitech+ rods for $99.95 (The ones with 3/8" bolts etc)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayI ... &rd=1&rd=1
Also has Berg-style bronze bushed, forced oiling 1.25 and 1.4 ratio rockers w/shafts for $90. Come w/CrMo studs. (EMPI ones?)
I don't recall ever seeing 1.25s in that style, look nice.(See his store)
Note these will need hard tip valves or lash caps, not included.
I also actually spoke to a body at Web Camshafts the other day, very nice helpful folk if you can actually get thru.
Looks like they _may_ be able do give me a regrind of the stock cam for the profile I want if I use 1.25 rockers.
(86b/119, 120 LC, 7 degree retard (Miller Cycle timing) T4 lobe profile/ramps to match the T4 lifters in the WBX)
Failing that, it can go on a std T1 cam blank for the usual price.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayI ... &rd=1&rd=1
Also has Berg-style bronze bushed, forced oiling 1.25 and 1.4 ratio rockers w/shafts for $90. Come w/CrMo studs. (EMPI ones?)
I don't recall ever seeing 1.25s in that style, look nice.(See his store)
Note these will need hard tip valves or lash caps, not included.
I also actually spoke to a body at Web Camshafts the other day, very nice helpful folk if you can actually get thru.
Looks like they _may_ be able do give me a regrind of the stock cam for the profile I want if I use 1.25 rockers.
(86b/119, 120 LC, 7 degree retard (Miller Cycle timing) T4 lobe profile/ramps to match the T4 lifters in the WBX)
Failing that, it can go on a std T1 cam blank for the usual price.
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
- Unkl Ian
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 12:01 am
Rolf wrote: ....and we will recieve CB Performance rods within a few days
and then I'll be able to determine if there is enough material in
the small end of the rod to machine it for a larger 24 mm bushing.
I'll return with more info when I get the rods and done a few measurement![]()
/R
Rolf: what happened with the CB rods ?




