Budget 100x71 Build

This is the place to discuss, or get help with any of your Type 4 questions.
cal 67
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by cal 67 »

The 914s are a better option, in my opinion because of the plug position. Not because of a perceived power difference, but because of chamber thickness at the plug area.

Got some work done. Waiting on valves and welding gas atm, so just doing other small stuff till then. Made a tailstock piece for the 100s and cut the ends off some stock pushrods. I'm pretty sure the Comp Cams ends are much longer, and the pushrods need to be 6mm shorter than stock approximately. I'll do geometry first, then do final cut. The cylinders will also need about 6mm shortening.

Image

Image

Image

Image
cal 67
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by cal 67 »

Got em!

Image

Image

Image

Image
twodollardoug
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:38 pm

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by twodollardoug »

So do you press them in dry? Or use green loctite?
cal 67
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by cal 67 »

twodollardoug wrote: Sun Dec 27, 2020 6:33 pm So do you press them in dry? Or use green loctite?
I have press-fit loctite, but regular interference-fit and oil works great. I need a #2 drill bit to get about .004" interference. I'll taper one end and leave the other blank till I come up with a length.
twodollardoug
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:38 pm

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by twodollardoug »

Gotcha. Please take photos when you press them in. I would like to see how you support the pushrod when you press them.
cal 67
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by cal 67 »

Okay. I'll try. I just use two lifters on each end, and drive them in with a mallet.
cal 67
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by cal 67 »

Tapering over a distance of 3" looked excessive. I settled for a 1.5° angle and 2 1/4" of tapering. I trashed the first pushrod, so I'll make another tomorrow. It looks like the end is bigger, but they are exactly the same size. The order was: drill .550" deep with a #2 bit (.224"). The end is .500" long. Then face the end. I'ma come in with a 90° countersink to help installation. Then start .050" into the pushrod and cut inward at a 1.5° angle.

Image

Image

Image

Image
Eddie010
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 1:27 am

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by Eddie010 »

Thats way Cool, you made your own tapered pushrods.
cal 67
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by cal 67 »

K. Last pushrod post! I promise!😅 Wanted to see how one looked with the end on.

1. Oil
2. Use old lifter on solid surface
3. Tap opposite end with rubber mallet
4. Only went 3/4 down. Had to heat up the rod, then it went down easy

Image

Image

Image

Image

Waiting on welding gas. Waiting on valves. Waiting on my Q cam. I guess I'll do some mocking till then...
wreck
Posts: 496
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2014 12:07 am

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by wreck »

that is a great idea for strong alloy pushrods . how much longer are the comp cams ends ? I need longer than stock pushrods because of the rocker spacers and stroke etc
No matter where you go , there you are !
twodollardoug
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:38 pm

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by twodollardoug »

The last time I used the lifter trick I was breaking the lifters. I didn't think to heat them up.
cal 67
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by cal 67 »

twodollardoug wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 10:29 pm The last time I used the lifter trick I was breaking the lifters. I didn't think to heat them up.
Also depends on the interference-fit and lube. Some steel pushrods have a lot of unneeded interference - about .012". You can see the end bulge out. Stock 1600s bulged too. Silly, IMO. The ends can't go anywhere.
cal 67
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by cal 67 »

wreck wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 10:12 pm that is a great idea for strong alloy pushrods . how much longer are the comp cams ends ? I need longer than stock pushrods because of the rocker spacers and stroke etc
.5625" (9/16"), but I don't know how you'll get the ends off without removing at least .200" from each end to get the tips off. Maybe a slide hammer with some hook attachment? To make it longer you'd have to avoid trimming too much of the pushrod.
wreck
Posts: 496
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2014 12:07 am

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by wreck »

thanks , yes it will be a struggle to remove the ends . I might be able to weld a nut to one end and fit a grease nipple , weld up the other and use a grease gun to hydraulic out the ends .That Q cam looks pretty huge . 289deg at 0.050 .
No matter where you go , there you are !
User avatar
Clatter
Posts: 2056
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2002 1:01 am

Re: Budget 100x71 Build

Post by Clatter »

subtaf wrote: Sat Dec 26, 2020 11:06 pm Love the experimentation and your work with this build.
I'm following along closely as I'd like to build a slightly down tuned version of this with a stroke around ~76mm (can always be talked into more) and peak hp a bit over 6000rpm. Shooting for 180~200hp.
With the infilling required in the chambers do you think starting with a basic 2L AMC head would require much the same amount of work or are the intake ports far smaller?
Keep the posts & photos coming please.
I can answer this one..
AMC castings don't have the 914 2.0 plug location.
You leave a lot of power on the table if the plug is hidden in the side of the chamber like all the other heads.
Even though you could weld the chambers and old plug hole up, and build a pad for the 914 2.0 plug,
making up a fixture to machine in the new plug location would be a task.
One that is far easier to solve by buying the AA 914 2.0 heads in the first place..
Maybe if you have access to a machine shop and some extra time?
Speedier than a Fasting Bullet!

Beginners' how-to Type 4 build thread ---> http://shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=145853
Post Reply