www.apfelbeck.nl

This is the place to discuss, or get help with any of your Type 4 questions.
mikko k
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 1:58 pm

Post by mikko k »

Wesayso wrote:
mikko k wrote:They have done a great job!! I do respect that. BUT, Why a 12 valve heads? Porsche has done 4 valves heads for years! Why don't develop a 5 valve cylinder head with twin spark and douple OHC heads?? No rockers, no mass, more revs, ect.??
4 valve aircooled heads are prone to have cooling issues at the exhaust valves. Even Porsche used water cooling on the 4 valve heads. The cylinderheads we are working on were designed long ago by a great engineer. That's the main reason we stick to this concept.

Even we have wild dreams of DOHC but hey, we're working on finishing a part of history here and we are not complaining :wink:

And I do believe we will not stop after this :shock:

Very very good!! I really don't complain, just go further!!
User avatar
Wesayso
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 4:21 pm

Post by Wesayso »

Hi all,

Just wanted to anounce a small update on the Apfelbeck project with some new 3D Graphics...

Image
User avatar
Wally
Posts: 4567
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 12:01 am

Post by Wally »

I really like how the central valve cover turned out. Very solid. I hope Roberto can CNC it out of an alu block very soon :lol:
Also very cool how you managed to improve the original heads(molds) design with the 'slight' modifications you incorporated into them.
It sure looks to turn out even better than Herr Apfelbeck ever would have dreamed of :wink:
Thanks Ronald!

Groeten,
Walter
T4T: 2,4ltr Type 4 Turbo engine, 10.58 1/4 mi in a streetlegal 1303

"Mine isn't turbo'd to make a slow engine fast, but to make a fast engine insane" - Chip Birks
User avatar
Wesayso
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 4:21 pm

Post by Wesayso »

Another update on the Apfelbeck Project...

Some of you might have seen the first pictures of our new Cylinders on Jake's forum, but some better Pictures are available now on www.Apfelbeck.nl

Image

As well as a new look on the Home page ;)

Image

Enjoy!

The Apfelbeck Team
User avatar
Wesayso
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 4:21 pm

Post by Wesayso »

A week ago we gave a presentation of our Apfelbeck Project at an Autodesk Inventor User Group meeting. For this event we played with the new Inventor Studio to create a new movie. Needles to say that movie can be found on our site www.apfelbeck.nl

A small preview:
Image
User avatar
Ephry73
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 12:01 am

Post by Ephry73 »

SWEET!@

E
User avatar
Can Drive Soon
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 1:08 pm

Post by Can Drive Soon »

What would you think the redline could be on these heads? 9,000+?







But, you do know where this is taking you, don't you?
User avatar
Piledriver
Moderator
Posts: 22842
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am

Post by Piledriver »

The heads probably wouldn't be the limiter anymore.

With Pneumatic valve springs, 15K would probably be reasonable ;-)
(Why doesn't somebody make "generic" pneumatic valve springs?
Too many racing classes outlaw them?)
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
User avatar
Can Drive Soon
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 1:08 pm

Post by Can Drive Soon »

15,000! Wow thats like higher thatn a Ferrari, or Lamborghini. But I think 15 might be too high. Les wait and see what the Apfelbeck guys say.
User avatar
Wally
Posts: 4567
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 12:01 am

Post by Wally »

Can Drive Soon wrote:the Apfelbeck guys
Haha, that sounds funny!
Well, we won't know for sure either of course, but we have selected the valve train components for the first prototyp ( 2 liter) engine to accomodate indeed somewhere around 9000 rpm with some reserve build in iirc. But if it still is making more power at 8000 rpm and peaking at 8500, I would be very happy :D
Being able to rev 8500 rpm or making max power there are two entirely different things mind you.
Since we will be using a small stroke counterweighted crank (66 mm) and some other (semi-common) tricks in the oiling department, the rotating masses should be ok for that rpm as well...
T4T: 2,4ltr Type 4 Turbo engine, 10.58 1/4 mi in a streetlegal 1303

"Mine isn't turbo'd to make a slow engine fast, but to make a fast engine insane" - Chip Birks
User avatar
Can Drive Soon
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 1:08 pm

Post by Can Drive Soon »

You sholud build and engine just to blow it up to find the absolute redline. (1 of my supid ideas). If you have money to burn.
User avatar
Wesayso
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 4:21 pm

Post by Wesayso »

Can Drive Soon wrote:You sholud build and engine just to blow it up to find the absolute redline. (1 of my supid ideas). If you have money to burn.
for a minute there you sounded like one of our Team members :lol:
User avatar
Can Drive Soon
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 1:08 pm

Post by Can Drive Soon »

Want and more ideas? :lol:
BAVWCJoel
Posts: 293
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 12:01 am

Post by BAVWCJoel »

Just outta curiousity... I was wondering how the cam/vavle train was going to recieve any oiling. Sense you moved the cam out to the heads now it is nessicary to have a decent oiling system to reach the cam bearings, and all the high friction areas. And seems like before with the pushrods, there was adaquet oiling to the heads. But sense with your motor there is going to be no use for them, and you probably welded up the original pushrod tube holes on the case itself, does this limit your heads to a 2 stage oiling system with a dry sump? Again I'm just curious as to how this is gonna work out. I can see the use of a belt drivin 2 stage dry sump. They heads are sort of like split heads, in that it's a head per a cylinder, with a porsche like cam running through 2 of them, or am I seeing this all wrong?

Thanks.

Joel
User avatar
Wesayso
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 4:21 pm

Post by Wesayso »

BAVWCJoel wrote:Just outta curiousity... I was wondering how the cam/vavle train was going to recieve any oiling. Sense you moved the cam out to the heads now it is nessicary to have a decent oiling system to reach the cam bearings, and all the high friction areas. And seems like before with the pushrods, there was adaquet oiling to the heads. But sense with your motor there is going to be no use for them, and you probably welded up the original pushrod tube holes on the case itself, does this limit your heads to a 2 stage oiling system with a dry sump? Again I'm just curious as to how this is gonna work out. I can see the use of a belt drivin 2 stage dry sump. They heads are sort of like split heads, in that it's a head per a cylinder, with a porsche like cam running through 2 of them, or am I seeing this all wrong?

Thanks.

Joel
The heads will recieve the oil trough the Cam. That way we can reach every bearing and other places we need oil. Oiling systems like this have been used succesfully in racing and in road going cars.
You're right about the dry sump pump an again right on the Porsche like cam trough the seperate heads. Porsche has a seperate single cam housing however joining the heads on each bank.
Post Reply