Page 1 of 1

Wide range of Compression between cylinders, is it bad?

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2021 3:37 am
by jared0
Engine is a rebuilt type IV 2.0, dual Weber IDF 40s, with 2000 miles on it. That's all I really know for sure.

Mechanic told me:

"Cylinder compression
1, 140
2, 160
3, 172
4, 158.
Leak down on cylinder 1 is 68 over 85% and the leakage was about a 50/50 split between the rings (coming out the oil fill tube) and the exhaust. Causes a dead skip at idle and picks up at higher rpm. I tried swapping around spark plugs and ignition Leeds. I don't believe spark is the problem. And the competition is a little low but should run. Cleaned idle jet for that cylinder and no change"

It seems those numbers are above the expected range. And obviously we prefer the numbers to be the same. But could I safely drive from Vermont to Pennsylvania? If I take it easy and make a 2 day trip?

Re: Wide range of Compression between cylinders, is it bad?

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2021 7:11 am
by Clatter
As long as the valve adjustment isn’t moving around why not run it?
Perhaps it wasn’t tuned well early in life?
Get a wideband on it to tune it well and maybe some hard running will get it broken in..

Re: Wide range of Compression between cylinders, is it bad?

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2021 11:11 am
by jared0
Also, one other thing I know. It has hydraulic lifters. Sorry I forgot that.

Clatter: that's where I'm leaning towards, I've definitely driven longer with worse. I think just keep an eye on my CHT and take it easy on the mountains. Mechanic seems more concerned, but he's an aircraft/motorcycle mechanic by trade. So maybe he's more exacting than us VDub wrenchers.