Top mount intercooler.
- panel
- Posts: 4233
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2000 12:01 am
Re: Top mount intercooler.
Vee Dub Nut.....two questions.....I always thought the BOV should be as close to the TB as possible ? And what was the reason and/or engineering behind running a 'Y' intake as opposed to a 'T' style intake manifold.
'65 Bus with a JDM Subaru EJ20 Turbo
Built by Germans powered by Japanese and brought together by Canadians
Built by Germans powered by Japanese and brought together by Canadians
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2015 5:27 pm
Re: Top mount intercooler.
Having the BOV close to the TB is "supposed" to improve boost response between gears. From my research it ultimately doesn't matter. If you look at modern turbocharged cars, most of them have the BOV or bypass valve integrated with the compressor housing like the VW 2.0T does.
-Nick-
-Nick-
- Vee Dub Nut
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2002 12:01 am
Re: Top mount intercooler.
Hey Panel
RE: BOV location:
I picked pre-intercooler primarily because I intend to still add some provision for water/meth injection downstream of the intercooler (if/when i really lean on the car), and I simply wanted to the BOV to be sufficiently away from that point as to not vent any water/meth out of the intake during shifts/blow off events.
I did a bunch of reading about ideal BOV location, and it seems to be pretty split into two camps: 1) as close to the throttle body as possible, and 2) as close to the turbo as possible. Both have their arguments as to why. In practicality, even OEM's have them in a wide range of locations/configurations, and I just don't think it matters as much as we tend to think it does, so long as you have one in there.
RE: Y vs T
In general a fabricated Y should have a lot better flow coefficient than a hard 90/tee. Since I'm injecting fuel at the plenums out at the heads, I opted for the Y to make that transition behind the throttle body to be a smooth as possible for the air flow. I've read that for draw through setups (or other setups that inject fuel before that part of the intake), that the T is preferred to introduce more turbulence to help with fuel mixing. No first hand experience with that though. I've used a hard tee on my old port injected EFI turbo setup in the past, and just opted to fab up a nice smooth Y this go around. Another one of those things that I think matters less in actuality than we tend to think, but technically the Y should flow better.
Fightin' Texas Aggie Class of 2006
67 Beetle
74 Transporter (SOHC EJ25)
See all my VW pics on Instagram @ vee_dub_nut
67 Beetle
74 Transporter (SOHC EJ25)
See all my VW pics on Instagram @ vee_dub_nut
- Vee Dub Nut
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2002 12:01 am
Re: Top mount intercooler.
Yea, that is the same justification I saw for BOV close to the TB when I researched it.nbuscemi wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 7:24 pm Having the BOV close to the TB is "supposed" to improve boost response between gears. From my research it ultimately doesn't matter. If you look at modern turbocharged cars, most of them have the BOV or bypass valve integrated with the compressor housing like the VW 2.0T does.
-Nick-
Fightin' Texas Aggie Class of 2006
67 Beetle
74 Transporter (SOHC EJ25)
See all my VW pics on Instagram @ vee_dub_nut
67 Beetle
74 Transporter (SOHC EJ25)
See all my VW pics on Instagram @ vee_dub_nut
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2015 5:27 pm
Re: Top mount intercooler.
I just noticed your signature... are you located in Texas?
- Vee Dub Nut
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2002 12:01 am
Re: Top mount intercooler.
Was.. Born and raised there, went to A&M, and the wife and I lived in San Antonio after school up until 2018. Now in the greater Atlanta GA area (where the wifey is from).
Fightin' Texas Aggie Class of 2006
67 Beetle
74 Transporter (SOHC EJ25)
See all my VW pics on Instagram @ vee_dub_nut
67 Beetle
74 Transporter (SOHC EJ25)
See all my VW pics on Instagram @ vee_dub_nut
- Wally
- Posts: 4566
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 12:01 am
Re: Top mount intercooler.
I think the reason a T works so well in reality might just be that flow in the manifold (and headers) is not one-way all of the time.Vee Dub Nut wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2023 9:03 am
RE: Y vs T
In general a fabricated Y should have a lot better flow coefficient than a hard 90/tee. Since I'm injecting fuel at the plenums out at the heads, I opted for the Y to make that transition behind the throttle body to be a smooth as possible for the air flow. I've read that for draw through setups (or other setups that inject fuel before that part of the intake), that the T is preferred to introduce more turbulence to help with fuel mixing. No first hand experience with that though. I've used a hard tee on my old port injected EFI turbo setup in the past, and just opted to fab up a nice smooth Y this go around. Another one of those things that I think matters less in actuality than we tend to think, but technically the Y should flow better.
T4T: 2,4ltr Type 4 Turbo engine, 10.58 1/4 mi in a streetlegal 1303
"Mine isn't turbo'd to make a slow engine fast, but to make a fast engine insane" - Chip Birks
"Mine isn't turbo'd to make a slow engine fast, but to make a fast engine insane" - Chip Birks
-
- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:44 pm
Top mount intercooler.
Only recently fully understood the impact of turbo exhaust manifold back pressure vs intake pressure and how it affects camshaft selection. Definitely an “ah!” moment.
Although maybe that’s not relevant to your point
Although maybe that’s not relevant to your point
