fastback
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:11 pm
fastback
Hi all I am new to the VW culture and was wondering about the fastback particular the early ones looking on the Samba site I only find squarebacks are the fastbacks hard to find or just not in demand ?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:58 am
- raygreenwood
- Posts: 11907
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 12:01 am
- jasle
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:47 pm
I also like the fastback but any time I have one wifey wants to keep it for herself. When I have a square she won't drive it...therefore I get to drive it. So I am now buying a square.
I've had several of both...Cannot really say I ever noticed a diff in handling but I suppose slightly lower cg due to not having so much roof line up high?
I've had several of both...Cannot really say I ever noticed a diff in handling but I suppose slightly lower cg due to not having so much roof line up high?
- Clatter
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2002 1:01 am
The fastback is the fine, rare jewel of the type3 line.
Squares are mom's station wagon, and notches are just plain.
Take advantage of this while you can,
Because most people are not (yet) aware of this fact...

Squares are mom's station wagon, and notches are just plain.
Take advantage of this while you can,
Because most people are not (yet) aware of this fact...

Speedier than a Fasting Bullet!
Beginners' how-to Type 4 build thread ---> http://shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=145853
Beginners' how-to Type 4 build thread ---> http://shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=145853
- raygreenwood
- Posts: 11907
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 12:01 am
In the early 90's.....I could buy fastback...not running...no dents...for between $75 and $300. Wagons were about the same or less.
I started out with type 4's (my first car was a 411). I went to type 3's later...and back to type 4's.
The interior shape and dash of the type 3 was quite elegant I think. The lines were very clean on this car. The wagons are nice looking too...but I had a couple and just liked my fastbacks better.
The front suspension design I think is a major improvement over what came on te hbeetle. I think the engine cooling system was nicer as well...even if it was not as efficient.
I had a hard time owning a type 3 and a type 4 at one time. They both require the same amount of work except parts are harder to find for the type 4.
The type 3's are great cars. Sadly...jillions got scrapped in teh 70's and 80's before anyone would even bat an eye.
I spent $400 dollars in 1989 for a 1966 fastback with Euro marker lights, a 1500 S wagon with twin carbs ...like a 1966 or 68. And a 1969...all for $400. None ran..most were junk because they sat in a field for 15 years. I parted them out. Sad. Ray
I started out with type 4's (my first car was a 411). I went to type 3's later...and back to type 4's.
The interior shape and dash of the type 3 was quite elegant I think. The lines were very clean on this car. The wagons are nice looking too...but I had a couple and just liked my fastbacks better.
The front suspension design I think is a major improvement over what came on te hbeetle. I think the engine cooling system was nicer as well...even if it was not as efficient.
I had a hard time owning a type 3 and a type 4 at one time. They both require the same amount of work except parts are harder to find for the type 4.
The type 3's are great cars. Sadly...jillions got scrapped in teh 70's and 80's before anyone would even bat an eye.
I spent $400 dollars in 1989 for a 1966 fastback with Euro marker lights, a 1500 S wagon with twin carbs ...like a 1966 or 68. And a 1969...all for $400. None ran..most were junk because they sat in a field for 15 years. I parted them out. Sad. Ray