my type 4 2L in a notch build

Notches, fastbacks, squarebacks.
User avatar
Munchhausen
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:37 am

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by Munchhausen »

:shock: thats a lot of ign.adv.! Are you idling around 1100rpms?
The more i read here, the more i want to switch to gixxer TBs :lol:

munch
User avatar
supaninja
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:48 pm

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by supaninja »

1100 rpm is the cutoff where things get chunky, right now I got a good solid 1200 "idle". I got a really strong suspicion that it is caused by the injector angles, there isn't enough airflow and the fuel is pooling up in the heads and not able to be burned. The new manifolds will have the injectors in the same location/angle as the stock L jet end castings, I won't know until I try it. I did have the same issues when I was running the L jet intake, but I think those idle issues were cam related. Above 1100 everything is good. I've played with the timing and this motor just wants a lot of it, ran nice and cool all summer (hottest one in 100 yrs here), and my plugs don't show any signs of detonation so I'm giving it what it wants.
Image
'65 notch w/ a squirted type 4
http://supaninjanick.wordpress.com/
'68 "Zombie Response Vehicle" Westy
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=140387
User avatar
Munchhausen
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:37 am

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by Munchhausen »

Would think the idle thing is caused by the shortness of the runners. Know that phenomenon from the short stock type3 runners with the two carbs in combination with hot cam. Some say that just longer ( 4-5cm longer) runners would help alot. But that carbs :| ?
But maybe the injectors to big for good idle? And the old djet injectors were to bad in atomisation?
When you thinking of new runners you maybe should go around the curve like the djet ones, and mount the TBs in a horizontal way. Than the length is comparable to what the bug-guys have.
By the way this could give the option of a staged inj. with the two injector locations more away from each other. :roll:

munch
User avatar
supaninja
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:48 pm

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by supaninja »

it might be the short runners. The injectors I'm running right now are 185cc, same size as the Ljet. I'm keeping them down draft, but if the new inj location doesn't work out then maybe full sequential will work. I'm feeling pretty confident that it is the bad injector angle.
Image
'65 notch w/ a squirted type 4
http://supaninjanick.wordpress.com/
'68 "Zombie Response Vehicle" Westy
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=140387
User avatar
Piledriver
Moderator
Posts: 22779
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by Piledriver »

Probably that and lack of sequential, combined with quite a bit of overlap, likely to only help to a certain point.

MS2/3 sequential and the timed MAP readings (esp MS3 version) would likely clean it up a lot, but probably not perfect.
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
User avatar
supaninja
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:48 pm

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by supaninja »

Back to running stacks:

Image

And here is a close up of the 00-03 gsxr 600 pulley that fits like a glove on the 04-05 TB's

Image
Image
'65 notch w/ a squirted type 4
http://supaninjanick.wordpress.com/
'68 "Zombie Response Vehicle" Westy
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=140387
Steve Arndt
Posts: 7420
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 12:01 am

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by Steve Arndt »

Does your #2 valve cover, and chimney, both hook to your pan e vac setup?

You need some stubby coils, those things are honking long.

I'm running 380cc/min injectors N/A. I'm just starting to play with the sequential injection start angle. I'm working on getting the base tune as good as I can before I start "playing" with the fine tune stuff.

Can you post a pic of your #4 throttle cable pulley, the cross over one.

s
User avatar
supaninja
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:48 pm

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by supaninja »

I got the case breather, and both heads tee'd together to the evac. I have been meaning to plug the heads off, keep forgetting to get some 1/2" caps...doesn't cause me any problems as is.

I know right. I need to get on ebay and get the shorter version (2000-2003 gixxer). speaking of which, I had a little dejavu when I saw this http://www.aemelectronics.com/ignition- ... -coils-20/ They want $60 a piece, I got all 4 of mine for $10.

I'm guessing you want the pulley on #3, I dug up this pic. It's just the stock gixxer stuff, no point reinventing the wheel ;)

Image

The top cable comes from the go-pedal, the bottom goes to 1/2 side.
Image
'65 notch w/ a squirted type 4
http://supaninjanick.wordpress.com/
'68 "Zombie Response Vehicle" Westy
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=140387
Steve Arndt
Posts: 7420
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 12:01 am

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by Steve Arndt »

So to place this in concrete, what year cable pulley is that?

Did you see the gsxr 600 coils I have posted in my Redline thread? I can sell those cheap since I don't need 'em. I have since learned that the same 2 wire Denso coil from the honda cbr is shorter than the same coil in gsxr from 2006. The IGN1 coils that I am using are over three times more fowerful than any COP available that I've seen, so I'm staying CNP for now. Plus the upswept baja exhaust is only an inch from a COP.
User avatar
supaninja
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:48 pm

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by supaninja »

I'm currently using 04-05 gsxr 600 TB's

3/4 side (the above pic) is a 04-05 pulley
1/2 side is using a ever-so-slightly modified 01-03 gsxr 600 pulley

the 06-07 gsxr 600's used a round 1:1 ratio pulley and are different. I sent one to Dev to make a copy of it.


The 01-03 gixxers used the shorty stick coils too. that link to the aem pencil coils shows the differences between the earlier shorties and the later long ones, they are all the same denso coils. I'll keep that in mind about the cnp's.
Image
'65 notch w/ a squirted type 4
http://supaninjanick.wordpress.com/
'68 "Zombie Response Vehicle" Westy
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=140387
User avatar
Soul
Posts: 281
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 12:01 am

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by Soul »

Nick, are those stacks 48 IDA's?
User avatar
supaninja
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:48 pm

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by supaninja »

Nope, they are 45 DCOE stacks. They are extended as far as I can extend them with those 1.5" length silicone couplers.

Steve- I have a set of 40mm 06-07 TB's sitting here. If you reverse one of them then you can have the pulley's on the same side, either stealth with the pulley's in the back of the engine bay or bling and have the pulley's in the front for all too see.
Image
'65 notch w/ a squirted type 4
http://supaninjanick.wordpress.com/
'68 "Zombie Response Vehicle" Westy
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=140387
User avatar
supaninja
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:48 pm

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by supaninja »

So I have been playing with my foundry and made my first useful part:

Image

It replaces the access cover on my frame head and I'm going to mount the walbro to it.
Image
'65 notch w/ a squirted type 4
http://supaninjanick.wordpress.com/
'68 "Zombie Response Vehicle" Westy
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=140387
User avatar
supaninja
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:48 pm

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by supaninja »

I'm going to try a set of 40mm 06-07 gsxr TB's to see what the difference is in power and the vac signal. the 06-07's have a non-progressive pulley so I asked Devastator if he could make one...turned out perfect!

Image

Image
Image
'65 notch w/ a squirted type 4
http://supaninjanick.wordpress.com/
'68 "Zombie Response Vehicle" Westy
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=140387
User avatar
aircooledtechguy
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2001 1:01 am

Re: my t4 in a notch build

Post by aircooledtechguy »

I'm diggin' the progress. . .
Post Reply