Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
- buguy
- Posts: 6209
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
Oooh! That's going to leave a dent in your wallet!
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:26 am
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
Not too much news I’m afraid..
But. Header done, new turbo mounted, IC done (ish)
Body under modification and to be installed soon
The autumn is hunting for me, so weekends at the cabin hunting grouse![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
But. Header done, new turbo mounted, IC done (ish)
Body under modification and to be installed soon
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
The autumn is hunting for me, so weekends at the cabin hunting grouse
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
---
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
- Wally
- Posts: 4563
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 12:01 am
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
Nice how the turbo directly into the intercooler blows!
I say: good progress still. Small steps also make one big one hey![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
I say: good progress still. Small steps also make one big one hey
![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:26 am
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
Added some more aluminium to the bend, but thinking of chopping it off and welding a 3” bend there for less restrictive inlet
Not the best picture...
Not the best picture...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
---
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
- rubenski
- Posts: 2038
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:28 am
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
Optimal placement for the wastegate!
We're doin' it right![Image](https://emoji.tapatalk-cdn.com/emoji6.png)
![Image](https://emoji.tapatalk-cdn.com/emoji6.png)
![Image](https://emoji.tapatalk-cdn.com/emoji16.png)
![Image](https://emoji.tapatalk-cdn.com/emoji16.png)
![Image](//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20201010/97ce01df71eba402c1bc354206d2453c.jpg)
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-A515F met Tapatalk
We're doin' it right
![Image](https://emoji.tapatalk-cdn.com/emoji6.png)
![Image](https://emoji.tapatalk-cdn.com/emoji6.png)
![Image](https://emoji.tapatalk-cdn.com/emoji16.png)
![Image](https://emoji.tapatalk-cdn.com/emoji16.png)
![Image](http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20201010/97ce01df71eba402c1bc354206d2453c.jpg)
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-A515F met Tapatalk
Better to be blown than to suck!
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:26 am
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
The new turbo is a Borg Warner S257SXE.
Should be good for this engine.
Should be good for this engine.
---
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
-
- Posts: 17881
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:17 pm
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
Lookin' good but, not trying to be nasty here, if you have both tires go flat or one a big bump is the exhaust system high enough to not get damaged?
Lee
Lee
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:26 am
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
Don't know. The sump is lower, and it'll see minimum action outside the track. If a tire pops at 120mph, I've got more problems than the exhaust scratching the surfaceOl'fogasaurus wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:40 pm Lookin' good but, not trying to be nasty here, if you have both tires go flat or one a big bump is the exhaust system high enough to not get damaged?
Lee
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
---
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
-
- Posts: 17881
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:17 pm
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
That's probably true! You build looks pretty good, it was just that one picture that got me curious.bug66 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:42 pmDon't know. The sump is lower, and it'll see minimum action outside the track. If a tire pops at 120mph, I've got more problems than the exhaust scratching the surfaceOl'fogasaurus wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:40 pm Lookin' good but, not trying to be nasty here, if you have both tires go flat or one a big bump is the exhaust system high enough to not get damaged?
Lee![]()
Lee
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:26 am
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
I’ll take a ground clearance picture tomorrow.Ol'fogasaurus wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 8:12 amThat's probably true! You build looks pretty good, it was just that one picture that got me curious.bug66 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:42 pmDon't know. The sump is lower, and it'll see minimum action outside the track. If a tire pops at 120mph, I've got more problems than the exhaust scratching the surfaceOl'fogasaurus wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:40 pm Lookin' good but, not trying to be nasty here, if you have both tires go flat or one a big bump is the exhaust system high enough to not get damaged?
Lee![]()
Lee
It’s not that bad actually:)
---
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
-
- Posts: 17881
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:17 pm
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
I am sure you are correct clearance wise. I just brought it up as a "just-in-case" so all bases are covered. Always keep friend in mind so nothing bad happens.bug66 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:36 amI’ll take a ground clearance picture tomorrow.Ol'fogasaurus wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 8:12 amThat's probably true! You build looks pretty good, it was just that one picture that got me curious.bug66 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:42 pmDon't know. The sump is lower, and it'll see minimum action outside the track. If a tire pops at 120mph, I've got more problems than the exhaust scratching the surfaceOl'fogasaurus wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:40 pm Lookin' good but, not trying to be nasty here, if you have both tires go flat or one a big bump is the exhaust system high enough to not get damaged?
Lee![]()
Lee
It’s not that bad actually:)
Lee
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:26 am
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
Thanks!Ol'fogasaurus wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:39 amI am sure you are correct clearance wise. I just brought it up as a "just-in-case" so all bases are covered. Always keep friend in mind so nothing bad happens.bug66 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:36 amI’ll take a ground clearance picture tomorrow.Ol'fogasaurus wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 8:12 amThat's probably true! You build looks pretty good, it was just that one picture that got me curious.bug66 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:42 pmDon't know. The sump is lower, and it'll see minimum action outside the track. If a tire pops at 120mph, I've got more problems than the exhaust scratching the surfaceOl'fogasaurus wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:40 pm Lookin' good but, not trying to be nasty here, if you have both tires go flat or one a big bump is the exhaust system high enough to not get damaged?
Lee![]()
Lee
It’s not that bad actually:)
Lee
Thinking of it, the car will probably sit on the rear valance if the tire blows..
Low as almost can be!
---
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
-
- Posts: 17881
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:17 pm
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
Being a bit silly here but in the late 50's or early 60's when low riders were the thing ,before it became high riders due to drag racing, the low riders rule was a pack of cigarettes laid flat on the ground should just barely be slid under the frame. That didn't last long due to some bad accidents which is why the "rim rule" or 5" came in effect. That is: if the tire was flat nothing could extend below it and cause sparks or cause loss of control.
Lee
Lee
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:26 am
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
---
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:26 am
Re: Project CFC#1, turbo, back halfed and light (new name, new car page 15)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
---
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018
2165cc on a Borg Warner S257 SXE, DTA S60 on E85.
Boost was created only to make people smile, and make power!
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
10.626 @ 132mph SCC2016
10.407 @ 134mph SCC2017
10.221 @ 135mph SCC2018